![]() I argued this before, and I still stand by it: They'd also have better webcompat, and take away one reason to switch to Chrome (i.e., sites that break in Firefox that render fine in Chrome and sites that rely on cutting edge draft standards that Firefox won't implement for a few months/years). But they'd also be able to much more easily benefit from Blink's security (already had site isolation for years, apparently a better sandbox, etc) and the contributions thousands of other companies make to Blink (Intel, Samsung, etc), companies that don't contribute to Gecko and Webkit as much if at all. That would be the "trustworthy, community Blink". If Mozilla switched to Blink, they'd be maintaining their own version, and it could diverge from Google's.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |